Indian Polity • JudiciaryHard
In which landmark judgment did the Supreme Court of India rule that the power of judicial review cannot be curtailed by constitutional amendments, invalidating Clauses (4) and (5) of Article 368 added by the 42nd Amendment?
A. Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967)
B. Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980)✓ Correct Answer
C. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
D. Waman Rao v. Union of India (1981)
💡 Solution & Explanation
In Minerva Mills v. Union of India, the Supreme Court struck down clauses four and five of Article 368 introduced by the 42nd Amendment, affirming that judicial review forms an unalterable component of the basic structure doctrine. This landmark ruling prevented Parliament from claiming absolute power to alter the Constitution. Landmark constitutional judgments are vital for both preliminary and mains law papers.
More Indian Polity Judiciary questions
- Where is the High Court that exercises judicial jurisdiction over the State of Kerala located?
- What is the maximum number of judges (including the Chief Justice) that the Supreme Court of India can have,…
- Which Article of the Constitution deals with the superintendence of all courts by the High Court within its…
- In the administrative framework of Chhattisgarh judiciary, what is the role and constitutional basis of the…
- Which Article of the Constitution gives the Supreme Court original jurisdiction in any dispute between the…