Indian Polity • JudiciaryHard
Which landmark Supreme Court judgment formulated the 'Basic Structure' doctrine, establishing that while Parliament has wide powers of constitutional amendment under Article 368, it cannot alter certain fundamental features of the Constitution?
A. Golaknath v. State of Punjab
B. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala✓ Correct Answer
C. Minerva Mills v. Union of India
D. L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India
💡 Solution & Explanation
In the historic Kesavananda Bharati case of 1973, a thirteen-judge bench of the Supreme Court formulated the Basic Structure doctrine, limiting Parliament's amending power under Article 368 so that the foundational pillars of the Constitution remain inviolable. The Golaknath case had earlier ruled that Fundamental Rights could not be amended, which was superseded by this ruling. Minerva Mills reinforced the doctrine by safeguarding judicial review, and L. Chandra Kumar upheld tribunals' subjection to High Court writ jurisdiction.
More Indian Polity Judiciary questions
- Analyze the concept of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in Indian legal history: 1. PIL was introduced…
- Which Article of the Constitution deals with the transfer of cases from one High Court to another by the…
- Which concept allows the judiciary to invalidate any legislative enactment or executive order that violates…
- Which landmark Supreme Court judgment formulated the 'Basic Structure' doctrine restricting Parliament's…
- Under which Article of the Indian Constitution is the Attorney General for India appointed, and what is the…