Indian Polity • JudiciaryMedium
Consider the following statements regarding the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India under Article 131: 1. It extends to any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States. 2. It covers disputes arising out of any treaty, agreement, or covenant entered into before the commencement of the Constitution. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A. 1 only✓ Correct Answer
B. 2 only
C. Both 1 and 2
D. Neither 1 nor 2
💡 Solution & Explanation
Statement 1 is correct because Article 131 grants the Supreme Court original jurisdiction in any dispute between the Centre and one or more states, or between different states. Statement 2 is incorrect because the proviso to Article 131 expressly excludes disputes arising out of any treaty, covenant, engagement, or similar instrument which was entered into before the commencement of the Constitution and continues in operation. This exclusive jurisdiction ensures federal disputes are adjudicated neutrally at the apex judicial level. The Supreme Court's original jurisdiction does not cover private civil suits.
More Indian Polity Judiciary questions
- Examine the legal doctrines associated with Judicial Review and judicial independence in India: 1. The…
- Which Article of the Constitution allows the appointment of ad-hoc judges in the Supreme Court if there is a…
- Which Article of the Indian Constitution specifies that a judge of a High Court shall be appointed by the…
- Which constitutional provision empowers the President to appoint a judge of the Supreme Court as the Acting…
- What is the legal implication of the High Court of Kerala being designated as a 'Court of Record' under…