Indian Polity • JudiciaryMedium
Which landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India propounded the 'Doctrine of Basic Structure', placing implied limitations on the amending power of Parliament under Article 368?
A. Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967)
B. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)✓ Correct Answer
C. Minerva Mills v. Union of India (1980)
D. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)
💡 Solution & Explanation
In the landmark Kesavananda Bharati case of 1973, a thirteen-judge Supreme Court bench ruled that while Parliament possesses wide powers to amend the Constitution under Article 368, it cannot violate or destroy the basic structure or essential features of the document. Earlier rulings like Golaknath had placed rigid restrictions on amending fundamental rights, which this judgment balanced by allowing amendments provided core principles remained untouched. This doctrine acts as a vital judicial check against authoritarian legislative overreach in Indian democracy.
More Indian Polity Judiciary questions
- What is the primary objective of the 'Public Interest Litigation' (PIL) mechanism evolved by the Indian…
- Which writ is issued by a court to prevent an unauthorized person from occupying or holding a public office?
- Under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution, High Courts have the power to issue writs for the enforcement…
- Under Article 142 of the Indian Constitution, the Supreme Court is empowered to pass any decree or order…
- Which landmark Supreme Court judgment introduced the 'Public Interest Litigation' (PIL) movement in India,…