History • Modern IndiaHard
Assertion (A): The Vaikom Satyagraha (1924-25) in Travancore witnessed active participation and coordination from Tamil Nadu leaders such as Periyar E.V. Ramasamy, who was subsequently imprisoned for spearheading the temple road entry agitation. Reason (R): The princely state of Travancore enforced rigid untouchability rules that barred lower-caste individuals from walking on public roads surrounding the Vaikom Mahadeva temple. Which of the following is correct?
A. Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A✓ Correct Answer
B. Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
C. A is true but R is false
D. A is false but R is true
💡 Solution & Explanation
Both assertion and reason are true and correctly linked because the Vaikom Satyagraha was launched to protest discriminatory prohibitory laws denying untouchables access to temple-abutting roads, drawing prominent regional leaders like E.V. Ramasamy from neighboring Madras Presidency to lead the campaign. Periyar's steadfast leadership and subsequent imprisonment earned him the honorific Vaikom Veerar. The movement marked a milestone in the struggle against social segregation in southern India.
More History Modern India questions
- Who among the following socio-religious reformers authored the radical critique of caste oppression titled…
- Consider the following events in the freedom struggle of modern Kerala: 1. The formation of the Travancore…
- The 'Paisa Fund' established in 1905 in Maharashtra to foster indigenous manufacturing and vocational…
- The famous 'All India Scheduled Castes Federation' was founded in 1942 by which prominent leader to…
- Which Governor-General of India is credited with the abolition of the cruel practice of Sati through the…